![]() ![]() Naturally, Intel became an extremely dominant figure in PCs since there were only two other companies with an x86 license (AMD, and VIA). By the late 90s, it became pretty clear that if you wanted to build a PC, you wanted Windows, which only ran on x86 hardware. In the two decades following the 8086, the modern PC ecosystem began to emerge, with enthusiasts building their own machines with off-the-shelf parts just like we do today. Celeron 300A The best budget CPU in town Qurren ![]() Although Intel and AMD started out as partners, AMD’s aspirations and Intel’s reluctance to give up ground put the two companies on a collision course that they’ve stayed on to this day. The company Intel teamed up with was none other than AMD, which at the time was just a small chip producer. IBM required Intel to find a partner that could manufacture additional x86 processors, just in case Intel couldn’t make enough. Because the 8086 was featured in such a popular device, Intel of course wanted to iterate on its architecture rather than make a new one, and although Intel has made many different microarchitectures since, the overarching x86 instruction set architecture (or ISA) has stuck around ever since. The massive success of the IBM PC and by extension the 8086 family of Intel CPUs was extremely consequential for the course of computing history. When the IBM PS/2 came out, the 8086 itself was finally used, along with other Intel CPUs. By 1984, IBM’s revenue from its PC was double that of Apple’s, and the device’s market share ranged from 50% to over 60%. The campaign was a great success, and the 8086 saw use in about 2,500 designs, the most important of which was arguably IBM’s Personal Computer.Įquipped with the Intel 8088, a cheaper variant of the 8086, the IBM Personal Computer (the original PC) launched in 1981 and it quickly conquered the entire home computer market. Codenamed Operation Crush, Intel set aside $2 million just for advertising through seminars, articles, and sales programs. Initially, sales for the 8086 were poor due to pressure from competing 16-bit processors, and to address this, Intel decided to take a gamble and embark on a massive advertising campaign for its CPU. In actuality, the 8086 was rushed out to put Intel on even ground with its rivals, and finally came out in 1978 after a development period of just 18 months. The 8086 wasn’t even the first single-chip processor with 16-bit capability as other CPUs, having been pipped at the post by the General Instrument CP1600 and the Texas Instruments TMS9900. The 16-bit computing trend emerged in the 1960s by using multiple chips to form one complete processor capable of 16-bit operation. The x86 architecture is named after this very chip, in fact.Īlthough Intel claims the 8086 was the first 16-bit processor ever launched, that’s only true with very specific caveats. The Intel 8086 basically ticks all the boxes for what makes a CPU great: It was a massive commercial success, it represented significant technological progress, and its legacy has endured so well that it’s the progenitor of all x86 processors. Intel 8086 Intel becomes a leader Thomas Nguyen Here are six of Intel’s best CPUs of all time. Every now and then, Intel has managed to shake things up on the CPU scene for the better. Fitbit Versa 3īut Intel couldn’t become the monolithic giant it is today without being a hot and innovative upstart once upon a time. I’m wondering if anyone has advice, or better yet experience, that is specific to the Wowza transcoder that would indicate one would be a better choice than the other. I have seen benchmarks that are heavily dependent on QuickSync showing similar performance, some tilting towards one processor, some tilting towards the other. Unfortunately, it does not appear that Intel intends to produce a socketed 6th generation processor with the same powerful GPU as the i7-5775C, which is an odd decision. ![]() The i7-5775C is only a 5th generation CPU and runs at 3.7Ghz but it has the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 with a massive 128MB eDRAM cache. I believe this is the fastest processor with a built in GPU for QuickSync. The i7-6700K is the latest 6th generation CPU that runs at 3.9Ghz and has the HD Graphics 530 GPU. I don’t think there is anything particularly special about the Xeon’s transcoding performance compared to the equivalent desktop chips. I don’t think the job necessarily requires a Xeon server CPU as I have 2 servers running successfully on earlier i7 generation chips. I have looked at the benchmark page that only describes the Xeon E3-1285 V3 CPU. I am trying to decide between these 2 CPUs as the basis for building a Wowza server that would be exclusively used for transrating 720p H.264 video from as many live stream sources as the system would support.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |